Seattle U.
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
997  Chay Weaver JR 33:44
1,037  Eli Boudouris SO 33:47
1,128  Nathan McLaughlin SR 33:56
1,231  Ben Monk JR 34:02
1,269  Matt Seidel JR 34:05
1,353  Jacques Hebert SO 34:13
1,574  Tyler Flannery JR 34:31
1,898  Cal Davidson-Turner SO 34:59
2,044  Collin Olson SO 35:13
National Rank #173 of 312
West Region Rank #23 of 32
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 21st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 29.4%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Chay Weaver Eli Boudouris Nathan McLaughlin Ben Monk Matt Seidel Jacques Hebert Tyler Flannery Cal Davidson-Turner Collin Olson
Sundodger Invitational 09/17 1189 33:36 34:11 34:08 35:08 35:10 34:38 34:19 35:27
UW Invitational 10/01 1184 33:41 33:46 34:05 34:14 33:58 34:40 35:16
WAC Championships 10/29 1155 34:16 33:29 34:07 33:18 33:57 33:39 33:43 34:40 34:37
West Region Championships 11/11 1156 33:19 33:19 33:45 34:03 34:33 33:49 36:20





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 21.9 648 0.1 0.3 0.9 1.7 3.5 4.8 6.8 11.5 15.7 15.7 12.3 9.9 6.2 5.4 2.3 1.6 1.1 0.4 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Chay Weaver 117.0
Eli Boudouris 119.8
Nathan McLaughlin 131.2
Ben Monk 139.7
Matt Seidel 141.2
Jacques Hebert 151.8
Tyler Flannery 170.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 0.1% 0.1 13
14 0.3% 0.3 14
15 0.9% 0.9 15
16 1.7% 1.7 16
17 3.5% 3.5 17
18 4.8% 4.8 18
19 6.8% 6.8 19
20 11.5% 11.5 20
21 15.7% 15.7 21
22 15.7% 15.7 22
23 12.3% 12.3 23
24 9.9% 9.9 24
25 6.2% 6.2 25
26 5.4% 5.4 26
27 2.3% 2.3 27
28 1.6% 1.6 28
29 1.1% 1.1 29
30 0.4% 0.4 30
31 0.1% 0.1 31
32 32
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0